In Defense of the American Prospect
December 25th, 2004




Winds of Change reports that the American Prospect is throwing around legal threats at a blogger and anyone who even dares to reprint his “defamatory and false allegations.”

The particulars of this are messy and the blogger in question, one Steve Sailer, doesn’t seem like any angel. Still, is this how media outlets are supposed to act? No.

But of course the Prospect isn’t really a media outlet and the folks who work there aren’t really journalists–they’re political activists. Not that there’s anything wrong with it!

I only point this out by way of suggesting to Winds of Change, Glenn Reynolds, and others, that this action from the Prospect shouldn’t be much of a surprise. (Consider the “journalists” the Prospect employs.) And unlike actual journalists, activists owe no particular devotion to honesty, objectivity, or free speech–except as it suits their interests. They should be free to use legal intimidation however they see fit.

So please, let’s not have any hand-wringing over the American Prospect‘s “crushing of dissent.” They’re not being hypocritical or unseemly or anything else bad. They’re just doing what they do.



  1. ed December 26, 2004 at 5:44 am

    Hmmm.So American Prospect should be forgiven because they are activists and aren’t journalists? Ok then. In the age of the Internet and blogs what exactly IS the definition of a journalist? And how is that different from an activist?Is Dan Rather a journalist? Isn’t Dan Rather, with regard to President Bush, an activist as well?Frankly when people try to combine journalism with ethics, I just laugh. Yellow Journalism has never gone out of style.

  2. REPLY
  3. Anonymous December 26, 2004 at 7:33 am

    The “moonbats will be moonbats” defense. Cute.Maybe throwing a rock through a McDonald’s window is also less of a crime when the rock-thrower is an “activist”?

  4. REPLY
  5. Anonymous December 26, 2004 at 5:28 pm

    Let’s see how “activist” defenders of The American Prospect react if Steve S.’s supports chip in enough $ to hire a law frim to send intimidating letters to individual American Prospect staffers.Or how about “activist” friends of Steve obtaining the home telephone numbers and addresses of TAP staffers? “Activists” can call American Prospect staffers in the middle of the night to express and manifest “activist” memes. Also, said “activists” can send TAP staff persons anonymous paper mail messages reminding TAP staffers that “activists” know where TAPers live.The endas justify the means, doncha know. There’s no such thing as moderation in the defense of virtue.-david.davenport.1@netzero.com

  6. REPLY
  7. Steve December 27, 2004 at 5:17 pm

    Interesting post, and it ties in neatly with another piece I just read comparing partisan reporting to traditional journalism.Frankly, I’m not sure if this guy is serious or not. But anyone who is still making an arguement FOR Dan Rather (even if it’s not a particularly enthusiastic one), probably deserves some attention. Or scorn. Or both.IN DEFENSE OF DAN RATHERI never thought I would be saying this, but I think departing CBS anchor is getting a bum rap. Yes, he’s certainly made some mistakes recently, and I think even he would admit that he’s not the most natural news anchor in the business. But many of his critics are using him as some sort of pinata, as they whack away at all the things they think are wrong with the broadcast network news business.http://www.allyourtv.com/0405season/defenseofdan.html

  8. REPLY
  9. Anonymous December 27, 2004 at 8:24 pm

    “the American Prospect is throwing around legal threats at a blogger and anyone who even dares to reprint his “defamatory and false allegations”No, the American Prospect made unfounded accusations that Sailer was a racist. Sailer pointed out the American Prospect writer attacking him had herself been subject to bogus accusations of racism by a third party (‘Ana Sofia’). TAP then made legal threats to Sailer and anyone else making reference to the accusations of ‘Ana Sofia’. Sailer himself never accused TAP of racism, he only pointed out the hypocrisy and irony of TAP’s position.

  10. REPLY
  11. REPLY
  12. Anonymous January 10, 2005 at 8:57 pm

  13. REPLY
  14. Anonymous January 14, 2005 at 12:48 pm

    Click Here To Enter

  15. REPLY
  16. Anonymous February 9, 2005 at 2:11 pm

    Hi, my name is alizee_bifrom United States , i like your web site, very good job !, my web site , my e-mail: alizee_bi@hotmail.com

  17. REPLY
  18. Anonymous February 21, 2005 at 9:33 am

    Hi, my name is sexy-girlfrom United States , Hi, my name is Gauge, i’love your Website. Very Good Job., my web site , my e-mail: gauge_amatrice@hotmail.com

  19. REPLY
  20. Anonymous February 21, 2005 at 11:58 am

    Hi, my name is britney_et_samanthafrom United States , Join The Orgie, my web site , my e-mail: samantha_brinks@hotmail.com

  21. REPLY
  22. Anonymous March 30, 2005 at 3:43 pm

    Hi, my name is alizee_bifrom United States , Hi, Very Nice Web Site, Visit mine Too !, < HREF="http://alizeevideosx.free.fr/videos-x/videos-x.htm” REL=”nofollow” TITLE=”Click here to visit my web site”>my web site , my e-mail: alizee_bi@hotmail.com

  23. REPLY
  24. Anonymous April 15, 2005 at 2:06 pm

    Hi, my name is britney_moviesfrom United States , Download The Videos_Paradise, < HREF="http://britney.webcam.perso.free.fr/adult/download2.php” REL=”nofollow” TITLE=”Click here to visit my web site”>my web site , my e-mail: alizee_bi@hotmail.com

  25. REPLY
  26. Anonymous April 27, 2005 at 5:11 pm

    Hi, my name is http://alizeevideosx.free.frfrom alizee_bimbo , hi, your site is very good, please look at mine too !, < HREF="http://alizeevideosx.free.fr” REL=”nofollow” TITLE=”Click here to visit my web site”>my web site , my e-mail: United States

  27. REPLY
  28. Anonymous May 17, 2005 at 6:10 pm

    Hi, my name is divx videos xfrom United States , hello !, < HREF="http://divx.videos.x.free.fr” REL=”nofollow” TITLE=”Click here to visit my web site”>my web site , my e-mail: divx.videos.x@sexbot.com

COMMENT