Staudt’s talking now. If you were curious as to what sort of treatment the other networks would afford CBS, you now have your answer. NBC has contributed absolutely no reporting of any worth to the story. ABC has latched on to it like a rabid, syphalitic pit bull. Good for them!

If you’ve been reading the papers you know how irresponsible the blogosphere is. Take this retraction from Soxblog. Nope, you can’t trust those bloggers–always making up lies for partisan political purposes and sticking to them for weeks on end, no matter what . . .

“Resurrection! He’s just like Jesus and he’s back…”

–Marion Barry supporter as quoted in the Washington Post after the ex-mayor/convict won his ward’s Democratic primary for city council last Wednesday.

Soxblog and others have written about Sophia Parlock, the cute little girl who had her Bush-Cheney sign ripped out of her hands.

It’s terrible, and you shouldn’t do that to little kids, but Captain Ed does a little digging and discovers that her father is strange fellow with a history of taking his children to protest Democratic candidates.

I don’t fault little Sophia, and whoever stole her sign shouldn’t have done it, but what sort of man uses his kids as political protest props?

Patterico, one of my favorite bloggers, catches the LA Times in a beauty.

Headline: “Long a Republican Bulwark, a Growing Arizona Is in Play.”

Inconvenient fact revealed in 18th paragraph: Bush leads AZ by 16 points.

Displaying admirable professional loyalty, Mickey Kaus asks, “Can’t they let Kinsley edit the news pages too?”

Who says they aren’t? After all, you don’t need polls to know that Arizona really is in play. The LA Times‘s real error was trying to prove a point that didn’t need to be proved!

The New York Daily News reports that Andy Rooney “Indicated yesterday he believes the controversial documents on President Bush’s National Guard service are fake and said it could cost Dan Rather down the road. ‘I’m surprised at their reluctance to concede they’re wrong,’ Rooney said, referring to CBS brass.”

What CBS has done is plasticize the truth. You have seen this before.

On August 14, 1998, the New York Times ran a remarkable story by Richard Berke. President Clinton was preparing to be deposed under oath by Ken Starr. The following are excerpts from Berke’s story:

President Clinton has had extensive discussions with his inner circle about a strategy of acknowledging to a grand jury on Monday that he had intimate sexual encounters with Monica S. Lewinsky in the White House, senior advisers have said.

Although Mr. Clinton has not settled on this approach, discussions have centered on a plan that would allow him to acknowledge a specific type of sexual behavior while still maintaining he told the truth when he testified in January that he never had “sexual relations” with the former White House intern, the advisers said. . . .

For months Mr. Clinton has publicly denied any sexual relationship with Ms. Lewinsky. So politically, an acknowledgment of some kind of sexual encounter poses considerable risk, particularly if it were linked to a legal argument that rests on a narrow definition of sex.

But Mr. Clinton’s advisers have said it poses a greater risk to tell anything less than the truth to a grand jury about sex with Ms. Lewinsky. . . .

The advisers cautioned that preparations for the grand jury appearance were continuing and that the strategy could still change as the President continued to examine the legal and political implications of various courses. . . .

Even as the President’s advisers review his options, some have prefaced their remarks by saying it is still possible that Mr. Clinton will say again, as he has publicly, that he never had sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky. . . .

Elsewhere in his report Berke noted that “It could be that some of the President’s advisers are discussing his possible approaches with reporters to gauge the political reaction.” Which is, of course, exactly what the president’s advisers were doing. The notion that, since the president was going to be testifying under oath, he simply had to admit the truth, was totally pushed aside. The issue was what strategy he would pursue, not what the truth was.

I know, I know–it’s ridiculous to always come back to Clinton. And it is. But in this case it was Bill Clinton who moved us into this post-modern definition of truth, who taught America that if you’re going to lie, you don’t even need to pretend to believe your own lie anymore. That’s because in modern American politics, there is no truth, there’s only strategy.

Dan Rather and CBS News have learned Bill Clinton’s lesson and found that today it doesn’t just apply to politics–it applies to journalism, too.

Another gem of a pool report today, courtesy of the Chicago Tribune‘s Rick Pearson:

Most uneventful bus ride which, for the record, took us on I-35W South to I-694 East to I-35E South to I-94 East to U.S. 52 South to Rochester. Only notes of interest along way were the smiling guys waving outside Jake’s Exotic Dancers, just outside St. Paul, the sign advertising Elk Meat for Sale in Zumbrota, MN, and the billboard advertising Windsor Canadian Whiskey taking note of Minnesota’s state bird: “It’s not your blood the mosquitos are after.” In Rochester, the top film on the marquee was “Without a paddle.” Know the feeling.

Why in the world would the Repulicans’ own “news” service put this headline on this story? It makes Scott McClellan sound mad as a hatter.