TNR on Lena Dunham
November 11th, 2014




It’ll be interesting to see if this James Wolcott blowtorch of a review costs The New Republic more subscribers than its endorsement of the Iraq War. It’s unclear which is more of a betrayal to the left. Sample hotness:

Such is the critical protection racket for the Lena Dunham legend that even Daum’s comparison of her subject to Woody Allen and J. D. Salinger was found not flattering, but mildly deflating. “Comparing Lena Dunham to Woody Allen Is Unfair—To Lena Dunham,” contended a headline at the Indiewire site, assuming a contrarian stance. “Likening the ‘Girls’ Auteur to Allen and Salinger predictably raises hackles,” the subhead read, “but what had they done at her age?” The author, critic, and hackles-tamer Sam Adams, wrote, “It’s worth pointing out that at 28, which is Dunham’s age now, Woody Allen was a successful but not widely known comedy writer and standup comic who had yet to release his first album, and J. D. Salinger was still four years away from publishing The Catcher in the Rye.” The article neglects to note that perhaps the reason Salinger didn’t match Dunham’s precocious output was because his early twenties were interrupted by something known as World War II (it was in all the papers), during which the future novelist was drafted, landed ashore at Utah Beach on D-Day, took part in the Battle of the Bulge and the Battle of Hurtgen Forest, interrogated prisoners of war as a member of the counter-intelligence division, and bore witness to one of the newly liberated concentration camps, a sub-camp of Dachau; after the war, Salinger entered a mental hospital, suffering from what today would be designated post-traumatic stress disorder. So the guy was busy.

The section on the New York Times’ Dunham obsession–which is largely based on this bit of progressive samizdat–is truly amazing: These tools have been swooning over her since she was a teenager.



  1. Nedward November 11, 2014 at 9:23 pm

    Ah, now I get it: she’s the SWPL Greg Packer

  2. REPLY
  3. Galley Friend J.E. November 12, 2014 at 6:38 pm

    There’s also the fact that both Salinger and Allen came from families without money. They had to climb ropes sans safety nets. (This does not, of course, answer why the two of them fell for waaaaay younger women/girls.)

  4. REPLY
  5. Galley Friend A November 17, 2014 at 3:55 pm

    This is exquisite.

COMMENT